AMD FX 8320 DRIVER FOR WINDOWS DOWNLOAD

The new lineup is in the table below:. Piledriver is a bit more power efficient than Bulldozer , which enables AMD to drive Vishera’s frequency up while remaining in the same thermal envelope as Zambezi. Vishera is still built on the same 32nm GlobalFoundries SOI process as Zambezi, which means there isn’t much room for additional architectural complexity without ballooning die area, and not a whole lot of hope for significantly decreasing power consumption. There’s no on-die graphics for starters. All of the FX processors remain unlocked and ship fully featured with hardware AES acceleration enabled. The 6 and 4 core versions get boosts to both sides, without increasing TDP.

Uploader: Kajinn
Date Added: 10 February 2017
File Size: 38.52 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 48395
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

It’s been a rough road for AMD over these past few years, but you have to give credit where it’s due: Log in Don’t have ame account? The table above supports that characterization. Vishera is still built on the same 32nm GlobalFoundries SOI process as Zambezi, which means there isn’t much room for additional architectural complexity without ballooning die area, and not amd fx 8320 whole lot of hope for significantly decreasing power consumption.

amd fx 8320

PassMark – AMD FX Eight-Core – Price performance comparison

As a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, AMD is now at GF’s mercy when it comes to moving process technology forward. Sign up now Username Password Remember Me. It simply has to make 32nm work for now. To make amd fx 8320 worse, before AMD could rev Bulldozer, Intel already began shipping Ivy Bridge – a part that not only increased performance but decreased power amd fx 8320 as well. Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment.

Piledriver is a bit more power amd fx 8320 than Bulldozerwhich enables AMD to drive Vishera’s frequency up while remaining in the same thermal envelope as Zambezi. In our conclusion to last year’s FX review I wrote the following: Intel’s Core i5 and below.

As promised we’ve now had multiple generations of each platform ship from AMD. At a high amd fx 8320, Vishera swaps out the Bulldozer cores xmd Zambezi and replaces them with Piledriver. In our conclusion to last year’s FX review I wrote the following:.

All of the FX processors remain unlocked and amd fx 8320 fully featured with hardware AES acceleration enabled. It’s also important to note that AMD’s pricing this time around is far more sensible. For more comparisons be sure to check out our performance database: The new lineup is in the table below: The Xf For more comparisons be sure to check out our performance database: There’s no on-die amd fx 8320 for starters.

Cache sizes remain the same as well, which keeps everything roughly the same. Across the board Vishera ships at higher base frequencies amd fx 8320 the equivalent Zambezi part, but without increasing max turbo frequency in the case of the 8-core parts. Piledriver is a light evolution over Bulldozer, so there’s actually no substantial increase in die area compared to the previous generation.

The Vishera Review: AMD FX-8350, FX-8320, FX-6300 and FX-4300 Tested

Clock speeds and Amd fx 8320 are amd fx 8320 up compared to Trinity. TDPs haven’t changed, cache sizes haven’t changed and neither have core counts. My hope is that future derivatives of the FX processor perhaps based on Piledriver will boast much more aggressive Turbo Core frequencies, which would do wonders at eating into that advantage.

The new lineup is in the table below:. The performance advantage that Intel enjoyed at the time was beyond what could be erased by a single generation.

The table above says it all. This is the same CPU core that is used in Trinity, but it’s optimized for a very different purpose here in Vishera. Brazos had a mild update, Llano paved the amd fx 8320 for Trinity which is amd fx 8320 shipping, and around a year after Zambezi’s launch we have Vishera: AMD’s targets are similar to what they were last time: The 6 and 4 core versions get boosts to both sides, without increasing TDP.

AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core

Look beyond the direct AMD comparison and the situation looked even worse. These chips are obviously much larger than Intel’s 22nm Ivy Bridge parts, but Intel has a full node advantage there which enables that.

The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in amd fx 8320 areas couldn’t significantly outperform AMD’s previous generation platform.